'Facebook vs. Twitter Essay\r'

'In the age of technology, trends suffer and go almost instantaneously. The trend of the decade; affable Media. Ten years ago when some whiz scene of Social Media, he or she and persuasion about Myspace. Today, however, Myspace is an afterthought, and there ar two newfound faces atop the Social Media world. These new faces are Facebook and twitter. They may conditionm very similar hardly they are extraordinarily diverse in their overall structure, their peer/follower format and their communication layout.\r\nEven though Facebook and chitter are both set up to make it easier for people to communicate, they are structured lots differently. Facebook, on one hand, gives the operator the total dexterity to customize his/her wall. From favorite foods to relationship status, Facebook truly has it all. iodin canisterister write a vague rendering of his or her life in the â€Å"about me” division or a detailed autobiography instead. later that, if one wants to tel l what he/she is doing, he/she can write a post with no limits. Facebook, without question, gives the exploiter the ability to firely customize his/her page; whereas chirp is set up in a often more(prenominal) basic format victimization a cheep Feed. A twitter feed is essentially a wall in the vaguest sense. The exploiter can write a brief biography, which has a uttermost amount of characters about oneself on the top of his/her page. to a fault one can â€Å"tweet” his/her thoughts, in trammel characters as well, to depict what he/she is thinking. So cheep is far less drug exploiter virtuosoly than Facebook.\r\nIn addition to the differences in structure, Facebook and twitter also make believe different friend/follower formats. Essentially, Facebook and Twitter are set up differently in the counseling friends are made. Facebook is set up in such a way that one can reign his or her friends and send a friend supplicate, and if one’s friend accepts, th e website lists that person in the user’s friends list. Once that person has friends, he or she can use a privacy move where only the user’s friends can see his or her wall. In this way, Facebook lets users know what his/her friends are doing. On the other hand, Twitter is set up with the fantasy of followers. This means if one wants to add another user as a friend, all the user moldiness do is beat â€Å"follow”. Any user can follow another user which pass on allow him or her to see what that user is doing. Lastly, Facebook and Twitter have different communication setups. Both Facebook and Twitter allow users to send direct messages to friends, but both websites have different ways to communicate. Facebook allows users to post on another user’s wall to commencement a conversation. As well as using posts, one can also comment on a friend’s post. If a user is interested in one of his or her friend’s posts, the user can simply click the comment button to say what is on his/her mind. Twitter on the other hand, does not give its users as many ways to communicate. In addition to the already stated direct messaging Twitter only allows its users to tag their friends in a tweet to talk. If they do not want to direct message, they can in public message them. So in the communication aspect, Facebook unimpeachably has the advantage.\r\nOn the surface, Facebook and Twitter seem alike but they are definitively different. Facebook and Twitter each have different structures, friend/follower formats, and communication layouts. Facebook is overmuch more user friendly allowing its users to fully customize their walls and statuses in an unlimited amount of characters, giving the user complete control of their wall. Also, Facebook is much more private in the ability to accept a friend request which gives that user to view one’s profile. Twitter on the other hand has a much simpler layout with very little privacy.\r\n'